Site iconJava PDF Blog

How to choose JPEG versus JPEG 2000 for image files

Since we started to support both JPEG and JPEG 2000 as image file outputs in our software, we have found that this is a very common question. So I thought a brief general explanation would be helpful.

JPEG versus JPEG 2000

JPEG files have the file endings .jpg .jpeg .jpe .jif .jfif .jfi while JPEG 2000 files finish with .jp2 .jpx .j2c .j2k .jpf. So kitten.jpg is a JPEG file and kitten.jp2 would be a JPEG 2000 version.

JPEG is the original standard and JPEG 2000 is the newer format. Both are open ISO standards with documentation online. If you want to read up, good starting points are https://jpeg.org/ or https://jpeg.org/jpeg2000/

JPEG 2000 has some interesting new features, but it is not a direct replacement for JPEG – there are still things JPEG does better and not all tools currently support JPEG 2000. The documentation online tends to be very technical and tell you about lots of the features (JPEG 2000 ROI for example) but not the pros and cons.

So I asked our development team to summarise for me in reasonably non-technical language the benefits of each.

JPEG is really good for

JPEG is not so good for

How does JPEG 2000 compare?

Which Image format to use?

JPEG where I need to ensure it works on everything, have small images and do not need to get the smallest possible file sizes.

JPEG 2000 where I have fast machines, want the best compression and am confident the users will be able to view them.

How to read and write JPEG and JPEG 2000 images in Java?

We have tutorials on